Chapter 4: Agent Types & Patterns
Types of AI Agents
AI agents can be categorized based on their capabilities, complexity, and interaction patterns. Understanding these types helps in selecting the right approach for specific use cases.
Agent Classification by Capability
π Reactive Agents
Basic "input β output" behavior with no memory or planning
Characteristics:
- Stateless operation
- Immediate response to current input
- No planning or goal decomposition
- Simple stimulus-response mapping
Use Cases:
- Simple Q&A chatbots
- Basic text generation
- Single-turn conversations
- Immediate response systems
Examples:
- Vanilla LLM interactions (GPT-3.5, Claude)
- Basic customer service bots
- Simple text completion tools
Implementation Pattern:
class ReactiveAgent:
def __init__(self, llm):
self.llm = llm
def respond(self, input_text):
return self.llm.generate(input_text)π οΈ Tool-Using Agents
Uses external tools/APIs via function calling
Characteristics:
- Can call predefined functions
- Enhanced capabilities through external services
- Basic tool selection logic
- Structured function call formatting
Use Cases:
- Weather information retrieval
- Calculator functions
- Database queries
- API integrations
Examples:
- GPT-4 with function calling
- Claude with tools
- ChatGPT plugins
Tool Integration Pattern:
class ToolUsingAgent:
def __init__(self, llm, tools):
self.llm = llm
self.tools = {tool.name: tool for tool in tools}
def execute(self, query):
# Determine if tools are needed
response = self.llm.generate_with_tools(query, self.tools)
if response.requires_tool:
tool_result = self.tools[response.tool_name].execute(
response.tool_args
)
return self.llm.synthesize(query, tool_result)
return response.textπ§ Planning Agents
Plans multi-step actions to accomplish goals
Characteristics:
- Task decomposition capabilities
- Sequential reasoning
- Tool chaining strategies
- Adaptive execution
Planning Strategies:
- Chain of Thought: Step-by-step reasoning
- Tree of Thoughts: Exploring multiple paths
- ReAct: Reasoning + Acting pattern
- Plan-and-Execute: Separate planning and execution phases
Use Cases:
- Research projects
- Multi-step problem solving
- Workflow automation
- Complex data analysis
Examples:
- AutoGPT
- ReAct agents
- LangChain planning agents
π§ πΎ Memory-Augmented Agents
Retains and recalls context from past interactions
Memory Types:
- Working Memory: Current task context
- Episodic Memory: Specific interaction history
- Semantic Memory: General knowledge
- Procedural Memory: Task execution patterns
Storage Technologies:
- Vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma)
- Graph databases (Neo4j)
- Traditional databases with embeddings
- File-based storage systems
Use Cases:
- Personal assistants
- Customer support with history
- Long-term project management
- Personalized recommendations
π€ Autonomous Agents
Operates independently with feedback loops
Characteristics:
- Self-correcting behavior
- Goal-oriented operation
- Minimal human supervision
- Adaptive learning mechanisms
Key Features:
- Performance monitoring
- Error recovery
- Dynamic strategy adjustment
- Continuous improvement
Examples:
- Autonomous software developers (Devin)
- Self-managing system agents
- Autonomous research assistants
π₯ Multi-Agent Systems
Coordinates multiple specialized agents
Coordination Patterns:
- Hierarchical: Manager-worker relationships
- Peer-to-peer: Equal collaboration
- Pipeline: Sequential processing
- Market-based: Competitive task assignment
Communication Protocols:
- Direct messaging
- Shared memory spaces
- Event-driven notifications
- Auction-based coordination
Examples:
- CrewAI teams
- MetaGPT organizations
- LangGraph multi-agent workflows
Agent Design Patterns
π ReAct Pattern (Reasoning + Acting)
Core Concept: Alternates between reasoning and action steps
Flow:
- Thought: Agent reasons about the problem
- Action: Agent executes a specific tool/function
- Observation: Agent observes the result
- Repeat: Continue until goal achieved
Example Implementation:
class ReActAgent:
def execute_task(self, goal):
thoughts = []
while not self.goal_achieved(goal):
# Reasoning step
thought = self.reason(goal, thoughts)
thoughts.append(thought)
# Action step
if thought.requires_action:
action_result = self.execute_action(thought.action)
thoughts.append(f"Observation: {action_result}")
return self.synthesize_result(thoughts)Benefits:
- Transparent reasoning process
- Error correction through observation
- Flexible tool usage
- Debuggable execution
π² Tree of Thoughts Pattern
Core Concept: Explores multiple reasoning paths simultaneously
Process:
- Generate multiple initial approaches
- Evaluate each approach's potential
- Expand promising paths further
- Prune unsuccessful branches
- Select optimal solution path
Use Cases:
- Complex problem solving
- Strategic planning
- Creative tasks
- Optimization problems
π― Goal-Oriented Pattern
Architecture Components:
- Goal Stack: Hierarchical objective management
- Planner: Action sequence generation
- Executor: Action implementation
- Monitor: Progress tracking
Goal Types:
- Achievement goals (reach specific state)
- Maintenance goals (preserve conditions)
- Performance goals (optimize metrics)
- Avoidance goals (prevent outcomes)
π Agent Factory Pattern
Purpose: Standardized agent creation and management
Components:
- Agent templates and configurations
- Resource allocation mechanisms
- Lifecycle management
- Performance monitoring
Benefits:
- Consistent agent deployment
- Efficient resource utilization
- Scalable agent provisioning
- Centralized configuration
π Feedback Loop Pattern
Learning Cycle:
- Action: Perform task
- Measurement: Collect metrics
- Analysis: Evaluate performance
- Adjustment: Modify behavior
- Iteration: Apply improvements
Learning Mechanisms:
- Reinforcement learning from rewards
- Supervised learning from examples
- Unsupervised pattern discovery
- Meta-learning (learning to learn)
Agent Architecture Patterns
ποΈ Layered Architecture
Layers:
- Presentation Layer: User interfaces and APIs
- Application Layer: Business logic and workflows
- Domain Layer: Core reasoning and knowledge
- Infrastructure Layer: Tools, databases, external services
Benefits:
- Clear separation of concerns
- Modular design and testing
- Reusable components
- Maintainable codebase
πͺ Orchestrator Pattern
Components:
- Central Orchestrator: Workflow coordination
- Agent Registry: Available agent catalog
- Task Queue: Work distribution
- Result Aggregator: Output combination
Workflow Types:
- Sequential execution chains
- Parallel processing branches
- Conditional logic flows
- Loop-based iterations
π State Machine Pattern
Elements:
- States: Discrete behavioral modes (idle, processing, learning)
- Transitions: State change rules
- Events: Transition triggers
- Actions: State-specific behaviors
Example State Flow:
Idle β (task received) β Processing
Processing β (task complete) β Learning
Learning β (update complete) β Idle
Any State β (error) β Error
Error β (recovery) β IdleFramework Implementations
LangChain Agent Types
| Agent Type | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Zero-Shot ReAct | No prior examples needed | General tasks, prototyping |
| ReAct DocStore | Document retrieval + reasoning | Q&A systems, research |
| Self-Ask with Search | Decomposes complex questions | Multi-step research |
| Conversational ReAct | Memory + conversation context | Interactive applications |
| OpenAI Functions | Structured function calling | Production APIs |
CrewAI Patterns
Role-Based Teams:
crew = Crew(
agents=[
researcher_agent,
analyst_agent,
writer_agent
],
tasks=[
research_task,
analysis_task,
writing_task
],
process=Process.sequential
)Multi-Agent Coordination
Hierarchical Structure:
Selecting the Right Pattern
Decision Framework
Consider These Factors:
- Task Complexity: Simple vs. multi-step workflows
- Autonomy Requirements: Human oversight vs. independent operation
- Integration Needs: Number and complexity of external tools
- Memory Requirements: Stateless vs. persistent context
- Scalability: Single instance vs. distributed systems
- Real-time Constraints: Response time requirements
Pattern Selection Guide
| Use Case | Recommended Pattern | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Simple Q&A | Reactive Agent | No memory or tools needed |
| API Integration | Tool-Using Agent | Structured external calls |
| Research Tasks | ReAct Planning Agent | Multi-step reasoning required |
| Personal Assistant | Memory-Augmented Agent | Context continuity important |
| Complex Workflows | Multi-Agent System | Task specialization beneficial |
| Self-Improving Systems | Feedback Loop Pattern | Learning and adaptation needed |
Performance Considerations
Optimization Strategies
Response Time:
- Cache common operations
- Parallel tool execution
- Lazy loading of resources
- Efficient memory retrieval
Resource Usage:
- Agent pooling and reuse
- Memory cleanup strategies
- Tool connection management
- Graceful degradation
Reliability:
- Error handling and recovery
- Retry mechanisms with backoff
- Circuit breaker patterns
- Monitoring and alerting
Best Practices
Development Guidelines
- Start Simple: Begin with reactive agents, add complexity gradually
- Clear Interfaces: Define explicit agent APIs and contracts
- Comprehensive Testing: Test each agent type thoroughly
- Monitor Performance: Track metrics and user satisfaction
- Plan for Scale: Design with growth in mind
Deployment Considerations
- Security: Implement proper authentication and authorization
- Monitoring: Real-time performance and error tracking
- Versioning: Manage agent updates and rollbacks
- Documentation: Maintain clear usage guides and examples
What's Next?
In the next chapter, we'll explore Human-AI Collaboration and learn how to design systems where humans and agents work together effectively.